Mozambique vs Peru: Seed — Cropland potassium

Mozambique
3,285 t
in 2023
Peru
4,060 t
in 2023
Mozambique rank
42nd
Peru rank
41st

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Mozambique
  • Peru
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 4,060 t against 3,285 t in Mozambique, a difference of 775 t.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 42nd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 885.49 t 2,278 t 1,392 t Peru
1970s 861.42 t 2,144 t 1,282 t Peru
1980s 862.62 t 2,166 t 1,304 t Peru
1990s 933.55 t 2,454 t 1,520 t Peru
2000s 1,697 t 4,055 t 2,358 t Peru
2010s 1,796 t 3,973 t 2,177 t Peru
2020s 2,789 t 4,312 t 1,523 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Mozambique or Peru?
Peru, at 4,060 t against 3,285 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Mozambique and Peru?
775 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Mozambique ranks 42nd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).