Mozambique vs Philippines: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Mozambique
- Philippines
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 3,285 t against 3,173 t in Philippines, a difference of 112 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.
Mozambique ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 885.49 t | 2,834 t | 1,948 t | Philippines |
| 1970s | 861.42 t | 3,757 t | 2,896 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 862.62 t | 3,270 t | 2,408 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 933.55 t | 3,546 t | 2,613 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 1,697 t | 3,742 t | 2,045 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1,796 t | 3,256 t | 1,459 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 2,789 t | 3,454 t | 665.33 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Mozambique or Philippines?
- Mozambique, at 3,285 t against 3,173 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Mozambique and Philippines?
- 112 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Philippines rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Mozambique ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).