Nauru vs Puerto Rico: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Nauru
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0.2604 t against 0.0644 t in Nauru, a difference of 0.196 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 4.0 times Nauru's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 169th and Puerto Rico ranks 166th of 185 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0378 t | 9.69 t | 9.66 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 0.0426 t | 6.07 t | 6.03 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 0.0451 t | 5.35 t | 5.3 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 0.0517 t | 1.76 t | 1.7 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0.0624 t | 0.6572 t | 0.5948 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0.0655 t | 0.4921 t | 0.4266 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0.0642 t | 0.2771 t | 0.2129 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Nauru or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 0.2604 t against 0.0644 t in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Nauru and Puerto Rico?
- 0.196 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Puerto Rico rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Nauru ranks 169th and Puerto Rico ranks 166th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).