New Zealand vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- New Zealand
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 303.74 t against 248.5 t in New Zealand, a difference of 55.24 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 297.02 t | 664.22 t | 367.2 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 316.42 t | 808.15 t | 491.72 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 429.68 t | 811.6 t | 381.93 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 389.86 t | 815.12 t | 425.25 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 436.67 t | 752.14 t | 315.47 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 402.71 t | 745.96 t | 343.25 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 269.59 t | 420.87 t | 151.28 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, New Zealand or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 303.74 t against 248.5 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 55.24 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- New Zealand ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).