Nicaragua vs Sudan (former): Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Nicaragua
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 705.65 t against 694.84 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 10.81 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 97th and Sudan (former) ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 703.55 t | 227.77 t | 475.78 t | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 733.38 t | 279.08 t | 454.29 t | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 696.05 t | 278.58 t | 417.47 t | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 702.02 t | 458.68 t | 243.34 t | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 786.4 t | 669.25 t | 117.15 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 761.51 t | 681 t | 80.51 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Nicaragua or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 705.65 t against 694.84 t in Nicaragua as of 2011.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Nicaragua and Sudan (former)?
- 10.81 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Nicaragua and Sudan (former) rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Nicaragua ranks 97th and Sudan (former) ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).