North Macedonia vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- North Macedonia
- Tunisia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 310.76 t against 303.74 t in Tunisia, a difference of 7.02 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 119th and Tunisia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 408.95 t | 809.28 t | 400.32 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 398.56 t | 752.14 t | 353.58 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 342.86 t | 745.96 t | 403.1 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 312.22 t | 420.87 t | 108.65 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, North Macedonia or Tunisia?
- North Macedonia, at 310.76 t against 303.74 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between North Macedonia and Tunisia?
- 7.02 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- North Macedonia ranks 119th and Tunisia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).