Oman vs Sao Tome and Principe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Oman
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Oman currently reports 8.95 t against 2.9 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 6.05 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 3.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Oman ranks 151st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 154th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0.0004 t | 3.48 t | 3.48 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 0.0005 t | 7.25 t | 7.25 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 0.0011 t | 2.9 t | 2.9 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 4.48 t | 2.9 t | 1.58 t | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Oman or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Oman, at 8.95 t against 2.9 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Oman and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6.05 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Oman ranks 151st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 154th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).