Rwanda vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,363 t against 1,263 t in Rwanda, a difference of 100 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,327 t | 1,081 t | 246.18 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 1,107 t | 1,224 t | 117.35 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,270 t | 1,329 t | 59.75 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,363 t against 1,263 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 100 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Rwanda ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).