Senegal vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Senegal
- Serbia
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 1,451 t against 1,363 t in Serbia, a difference of 88 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,672 t | 1,081 t | 591.61 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 1,362 t | 1,224 t | 137.72 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 1,957 t | 1,329 t | 627.83 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Senegal or Serbia?
- Senegal, at 1,451 t against 1,363 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Senegal and Serbia?
- 88 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Senegal and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Senegal ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).