Southern Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Africa
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 5,178 t against 1,696 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 3,482 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 3.1 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Southern Africa ranks 27th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 27th of 29 groups.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,582 t | 7,521 t | 5,939 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 1,692 t | 6,731 t | 5,040 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 1,824 t | 6,181 t | 4,357 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 1,587 t | 5,680 t | 4,092 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Southern Africa or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 5,178 t against 1,696 t in Southern Africa as of 1991.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Southern Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 3,482 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Southern Africa and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Southern Africa ranks 27th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 27th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).