Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 583.65 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 36.41 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 554.84 t | 431.52 t | 123.32 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 622.17 t | 572.51 t | 49.66 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 695.32 t | 704.34 t | 9.02 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 651.2 t | 769.9 t | 118.7 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 633.86 t | 836.34 t | 202.48 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 604.08 t | 527.31 t | 76.77 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 565.14 t | 598.16 t | 33.02 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 583.65 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 36.41 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).