Sudan (former) vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Sudan (former)
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 705.65 t against 631 t in Uruguay, a difference of 74.65 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 96th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 227.77 t | 694.75 t | 466.97 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 279.08 t | 614.99 t | 335.9 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 278.58 t | 460.55 t | 181.97 t | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 458.68 t | 393.26 t | 65.41 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 669.25 t | 747.69 t | 78.44 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 681 t | 1,278 t | 597.22 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Sudan (former) or Uruguay?
- Sudan (former), at 705.65 t against 631 t in Uruguay as of 2011.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Sudan (former) and Uruguay?
- 74.65 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Uruguay?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Sudan (former) ranks 96th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).