Sudan vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland potassium

Sudan
1,233 t
in 2023
Sweden
1,171 t
in 2023
Sudan rank
82nd
Sweden rank
85th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Sudan
  • Sweden
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1,233 t against 1,171 t in Sweden, a difference of 62 t.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sweden ahead.

Sudan ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 85th of 201 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Sweden Difference Ahead
2010s 943.8 t 1,332 t 388.49 t Sweden
2020s 1,268 t 1,190 t 77.99 t Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Sudan or Sweden?
Sudan, at 1,233 t against 1,171 t in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Sudan and Sweden?
62 t, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Sweden?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Sudan ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).