Syrian Arab Republic vs Uzbekistan: Seed β Cropland potassium
Seed β Cropland potassium over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 5,795 t against 5,037 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 758 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 38 regions.
Across the 4 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,926 t | 3,838 t | 87.9 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2000s | 3,926 t | 3,613 t | 313.39 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 3,704 t | 6,599 t | 2,895 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 3,931 t | 5,757 t | 1,827 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland potassium, Syrian Arab Republic or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 5,795 t against 5,037 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland potassium between Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 758 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed β cropland potassium?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).