Thailand vs Uzbekistan: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Thailand
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 6,357 t against 5,795 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 562 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,398 t | 3,838 t | 1,560 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 5,507 t | 3,613 t | 1,894 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 5,584 t | 6,599 t | 1,015 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6,043 t | 5,757 t | 285.59 t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Thailand or Uzbekistan?
- Thailand, at 6,357 t against 5,795 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Thailand and Uzbekistan?
- 562 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Thailand and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Thailand ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).