USSR vs World: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- USSR
- World
How they compare
World currently reports 954,211 t against 200,229 t in USSR, a difference of 753,982 t.
That makes World's figure about 4.8 times USSR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, World has been ahead every year.
USSR ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 201 countries.
World has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | USSR | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 234,200 t | 837,315 t | 603,115 t | World |
| 1970s | 230,902 t | 851,568 t | 620,666 t | World |
| 1980s | 214,493 t | 864,384 t | 649,892 t | World |
| 1990s | 199,248 t | 846,335 t | 647,087 t | World |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, USSR or World?
- World, at 954,211 t against 200,229 t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between USSR and World?
- 753,982 t, with World ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for USSR and World?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do USSR and World rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- USSR ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).