Aruba vs Grenada: Share of the population using improved water sources
Aruba
96.7%
in 2016
Grenada
96.8%
in 2017
Aruba rank
154th
Grenada rank
152nd
Share of the population using improved water sources over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 96.8% against 96.7% in Aruba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 154th and Grenada ranks 152nd of 231 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.8% | 95.5% | 0.3% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 96.7% | 96.9% | 0.2% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population using improved water sources, Aruba or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 96.8% against 96.7% in Aruba as of 2017.
- What is the difference in share of the population using improved water sources between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0.1%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for share of the population using improved water sources?
- Aruba ranks 154th and Grenada ranks 152nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population using improved water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.