Afghanistan vs Madagascar: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Afghanistan
36.4%
in 2024
Madagascar
38.6%
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
92nd
Madagascar rank
89th
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Afghanistan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 38.6% against 36.4% in Afghanistan, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Madagascar ranks 89th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.4% | 23.4% | 1.0% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 31.1% | 31.2% | 0.0% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 35.9% | 37.3% | 1.4% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Afghanistan or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 38.6% against 36.4% in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Afghanistan and Madagascar?
- 2.2%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Madagascar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Madagascar rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Madagascar ranks 89th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.