Côte d'Ivoire vs Guatemala: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Côte d'Ivoire
51.5%
in 2024
Guatemala
51.7%
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
77th
Guatemala rank
76th
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 51.7% against 51.5% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.3% | 59.7% | 18.5% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 46.1% | 55.6% | 9.5% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 52.5% | 0.4% | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Côte d'Ivoire or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 51.7% against 51.5% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Côte d'Ivoire and Guatemala?
- 0.2%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Guatemala?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Guatemala rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.