Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Ecuador
82.4%
in 2024
North Macedonia
84.7%
in 2024
Ecuador rank
39th
North Macedonia rank
37th
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Ecuador
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 84.7% against 82.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 39th and North Macedonia ranks 37th of 105 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.2% | 84.7% | 13.5% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 74.8% | 84.7% | 10.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 80.9% | 84.7% | 3.8% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Ecuador or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 84.7% against 82.4% in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 2.3%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and North Macedonia rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Ecuador ranks 39th and North Macedonia ranks 37th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.