Israel vs Lithuania: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Israel
99.5%
in 2024
Lithuania
99.3%
in 2024
Israel rank
15th
Lithuania rank
16th
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Israel
- Lithuania
How they compare
Israel currently reports 99.5% against 99.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 105 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.7% | 94.5% | 5.3% | Israel |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 98.3% | 1.3% | Israel |
| 2020s | 99.5% | 99.3% | 0.2% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Israel or Lithuania?
- Israel, at 99.5% against 99.3% in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Israel and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Lithuania rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Israel ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.