Myanmar vs Viet Nam: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Myanmar
74.2%
in 2024
Viet Nam
75.8%
in 2024
Myanmar rank
54th
Viet Nam rank
51st
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Myanmar
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 75.8% against 74.2% in Myanmar, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 54th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 105 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.6% | 73.8% | 15.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 71.2% | 74.8% | 3.6% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 74.1% | 75.6% | 1.5% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Myanmar or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 75.8% against 74.2% in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Myanmar and Viet Nam?
- 1.6%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Viet Nam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Viet Nam rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Myanmar ranks 54th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.