Naoero vs Nepal: Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water
Naoero
18.7%
in 2024
Nepal
23.6%
in 2024
Naoero rank
101st
Nepal rank
99th
Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water over time
- Naoero
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 23.6% against 18.7% in Naoero, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.3 times Naoero's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 101st and Nepal ranks 99th of 105 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.7% | 37.8% | 19.1% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 18.7% | 33.6% | 14.9% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 18.7% | 23.9% | 5.2% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water, Naoero or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 23.6% against 18.7% in Naoero as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water between Naoero and Nepal?
- 4.9%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and Nepal rank globally for share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water?
- Naoero ranks 101st and Nepal ranks 99th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban and rural population using safely managed drinking water. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.