Anguilla vs Seychelles: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Anguilla
2.5%
in 2017
Seychelles
2.3%
in 2024
Anguilla rank
89th
Seychelles rank
92nd
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Anguilla
- Seychelles
How they compare
Anguilla currently reports 2.5% against 2.3% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Anguilla's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Anguilla ranks 89th and Seychelles ranks 92nd of 231 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Anguilla | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4% | 5.7% | 2.3% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 4.1% | 1.5% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Anguilla or Seychelles?
- Anguilla, at 2.5% against 2.3% in Seychelles as of 2017.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Anguilla and Seychelles?
- 0.2%, with Anguilla ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Anguilla and Seychelles?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Anguilla and Seychelles rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Anguilla ranks 89th and Seychelles ranks 92nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.