Aruba vs Grenada: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Aruba
3.3%
in 2016
Grenada
3.2%
in 2017
Aruba rank
78th
Grenada rank
80th
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 3.3% against 3.2% in Grenada, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Aruba ranks 78th and Grenada ranks 80th of 231 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.2% | 4.5% | 0.3% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 3.1% | 0.2% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 3.3% against 3.2% in Grenada as of 2016.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0.1%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Aruba ranks 78th and Grenada ranks 80th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.