Aruba vs Mayotte: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Aruba
3.3%
in 2016
Mayotte
3.6%
in 2023
Aruba rank
78th
Mayotte rank
77th
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Aruba
- Mayotte
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 3.6% against 3.3% in Aruba, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Mayotte's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 78th and Mayotte ranks 77th of 231 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 2.7% | 1.2% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 3.0% | 0.3% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Aruba or Mayotte?
- Mayotte, at 3.6% against 3.3% in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Aruba and Mayotte?
- 0.3%, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mayotte?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and Mayotte rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Aruba ranks 78th and Mayotte ranks 77th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.