Belarus vs Reunion: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Belarus
0.1%
in 2024
Reunion
0.1%
in 2024
Belarus rank
162nd
Reunion rank
161st
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Belarus
- Reunion
How they compare
Reunion currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Belarus, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Reunion's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 162nd and Reunion ranks 161st of 231 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.3% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Belarus or Reunion?
- Reunion, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Belarus and Reunion?
- 0.0%, with Reunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Reunion?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Reunion rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Belarus ranks 162nd and Reunion ranks 161st of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.