Croatia vs Lithuania: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Croatia
0.1%
in 2024
Lithuania
0.1%
in 2024
Croatia rank
163rd
Lithuania rank
166th
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Croatia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Croatia ranks 163rd and Lithuania ranks 166th of 231 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.0% | 8.3% | 7.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 3.6% | 3.4% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Croatia or Lithuania?
- Croatia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Croatia and Lithuania?
- 0.0%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Lithuania rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Croatia ranks 163rd and Lithuania ranks 166th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.