Djibouti vs Guatemala: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Djibouti
4.7%
in 2024
Guatemala
5.2%
in 2024
Djibouti rank
64th
Guatemala rank
61st
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Djibouti
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 5.2% against 4.7% in Djibouti, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 64th and Guatemala ranks 61st of 231 regions.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.0% | 10.7% | 0.8% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 7.3% | 7.8% | 0.5% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 5.3% | 5.7% | 0.5% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Djibouti or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 5.2% against 4.7% in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Djibouti and Guatemala?
- 0.5%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Guatemala?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Djibouti and Guatemala rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Djibouti ranks 64th and Guatemala ranks 61st of 231 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.