Hong Kong vs Isle of Man: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2024
Isle of Man
0.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
182nd
Isle of Man rank
182nd
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Hong Kong
- Isle of Man
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Isle of Man, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Isle of Man has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 182nd and Isle of Man ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Isle of Man has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Isle of Man | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6% | 1.3% | 0.8% | Isle of Man |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% | Isle of Man |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Isle of Man |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Hong Kong or Isle of Man?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Isle of Man as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Hong Kong and Isle of Man?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Isle of Man?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Isle of Man rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Hong Kong ranks 182nd and Isle of Man ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.