Lebanon vs San Marino: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Lebanon
0.0%
in 2024
San Marino
0.0%
in 2024
Lebanon rank
182nd
San Marino rank
181st
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Lebanon
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 182nd and San Marino ranks 181st of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.7% | 0.0% | 6.7% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 0.0% | 1.8% | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Lebanon or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Lebanon and San Marino?
- 0.0%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and San Marino?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and San Marino rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Lebanon ranks 182nd and San Marino ranks 181st of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.