Norway vs Puerto Rico: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Norway
0.0%
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0.0%
in 2024
Norway rank
182nd
Puerto Rico rank
182nd
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Norway
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Norway ranks 182nd and Puerto Rico ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Norway or Puerto Rico?
- Norway, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Norway and Puerto Rico?
- 0.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Puerto Rico?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Puerto Rico rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Norway ranks 182nd and Puerto Rico ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.