San Marino vs Tokelau: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
San Marino
0.0%
in 2024
Tokelau
0.0%
in 2024
San Marino rank
181st
Tokelau rank
182nd
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- San Marino
- Tokelau
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tokelau, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tokelau ahead.
San Marino ranks 181st and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 1 and Tokelau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, San Marino or Tokelau?
- San Marino, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between San Marino and Tokelau?
- 0.0%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Tokelau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do San Marino and Tokelau rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- San Marino ranks 181st and Tokelau ranks 182nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.