Uzbekistan vs Viet Nam: Share of population not using improved drinking water sources
Uzbekistan
1.3%
in 2024
Viet Nam
1.2%
in 2024
Uzbekistan rank
113th
Viet Nam rank
114th
Share of population not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Uzbekistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 113th and Viet Nam ranks 114th of 231 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.6% | 14.8% | 9.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 7.4% | 4.3% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 2.5% | 0.9% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved drinking water sources, Uzbekistan or Viet Nam?
- Uzbekistan, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved drinking water sources between Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 0.1%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Uzbekistan and Viet Nam rank globally for share of population not using improved drinking water sources?
- Uzbekistan ranks 113th and Viet Nam ranks 114th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.