How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP

Chad

0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chad rank

3rd

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

1st

Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP over time

Chad
Sub-Saharan Africa

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 13.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 164 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Sub-Saharan Africa	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP	0.001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0017 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1970s	0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1980s	0.002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1990s	0.0026 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0024 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2000s	0.0019 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2010s	0.001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep and goats — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp, Chad or Sub-Saharan Africa?: Chad, at 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep and goats — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp between Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for sheep and goats — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp?: Chad ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/sub-saharan-africa/">Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 166 places, 8,898 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.