How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Costa Rica?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Costa Rica: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N)

Barbados

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Costa Rica

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Barbados rank

128th

Costa Rica rank

127th

Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N) over time

Barbados
Costa Rica

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 128th and Costa Rica ranks 127th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Costa Rica	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1970s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1980s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1990s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2000s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep and goats — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n), Barbados or Costa Rica?: Costa Rica, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep and goats — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n) between Barbados and Costa Rica?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Costa Rica?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Costa Rica rank globally for sheep and goats — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n)?: Barbados ranks 128th and Costa Rica ranks 127th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Costa Rica: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/costa-rica/">Barbados vs Costa Rica: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 166 places, 8,898 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Sheep and Goats — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.