Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep and Goats — Stocks

Sub-Saharan Africa
803.04 million An
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
36.96 million An
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Sheep and Goats — Stocks over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 803.04 million An against 36.96 million An in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 766.08 million An.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 21.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 33 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 192.51 million An 7.24 million An 185.28 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 213.03 million An 8.03 million An 205.00 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 259.94 million An 10.49 million An 249.44 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 300.94 million An 13.54 million An 287.39 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 411.63 million An 16.35 million An 395.27 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 610.10 million An 24.71 million An 585.39 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 772.39 million An 34.85 million An 737.54 million An Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep and goats — stocks, Sub-Saharan Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 803.04 million An against 36.96 million An in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep and goats — stocks between Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
766.08 million An, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sheep and goats — stocks?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep and Goats — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep and Goats — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-stocks-2/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-and-goats-stocks-2/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep and Goats — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep and Goats — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
240 places, 13,693 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).