Singapore vs Tuvalu: Sheep and Goats — Stocks, per capita
Singapore
0.0001 An per person
in 2023
Tuvalu
0 An per person
in 1992
Singapore rank
164th
Tuvalu rank
165th
Sheep and Goats — Stocks, per capita over time
- Singapore
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.0001 An per person against 0 An per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0001 An per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 165th of 165 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0008 An per person | 0 An per person | 0.0008 An per person | Singapore |
| 1970s | 0.0007 An per person | 0.0004 An per person | 0.0003 An per person | Singapore |
| 1980s | 0.0002 An per person | 0.0055 An per person | 0.0053 An per person | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 0.0001 An per person | 0 An per person | 0.0001 An per person | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sheep and goats — stocks, per capita, Singapore or Tuvalu?
- Singapore, at 0.0001 An per person against 0 An per person in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sheep and goats — stocks, per capita between Singapore and Tuvalu?
- 0.0001 An per person, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tuvalu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Singapore and Tuvalu rank globally for sheep and goats — stocks, per capita?
- Singapore ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 165th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep and Goats — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sheep and Goats — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.