Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Sheep — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Sheep — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.71 % change on previous year against 4.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 14.31 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 23 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5 % change on previous year | 10.61 % change on previous year | 8.11 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 1.38 % change on previous year | -1.93 % change on previous year | 3.32 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 2.02 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | 0.858 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 2.22 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | 0.1966 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3.17 % change on previous year | -6.47 % change on previous year | 9.65 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 3.4 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | 0.7999 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.82 % change on previous year | 10.24 % change on previous year | 8.42 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sheep — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.71 % change on previous year against 4.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sheep — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 14.31 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for sheep — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sheep — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.