Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated

Bahamas, The
0 kg
in 2023
Eswatini, Kingdom of
149.45 kg
in 2023
Bahamas, The rank
88th
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
84th

Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Bahamas, The
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 149.45 kg against 0 kg in Bahamas, The, a difference of 149.45 kg.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini, Kingdom of has been ahead every year.

Bahamas, The ranks 88th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 84th of 180 countries.

Eswatini, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas, The Eswatini, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kg 349.73 kg 349.73 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
1970s 0 kg 318.65 kg 318.65 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
1980s 0 kg 283.1 kg 283.1 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
1990s 0 kg 223.71 kg 223.71 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
2000s 0 kg 208.51 kg 208.51 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
2010s 0 kg 153.08 kg 153.08 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of
2020s 0 kg 149.45 kg 149.45 kg Eswatini, Kingdom of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep β€” losses from manure treated, Bahamas, The or Eswatini, Kingdom of?
Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 149.45 kg against 0 kg in Bahamas, The as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep β€” losses from manure treated between Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
149.45 kg, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of rank globally for sheep β€” losses from manure treated?
Bahamas, The ranks 88th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 84th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).