Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated

Guinea-Bissau
4,340 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4,598 kg
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4,598 kg against 4,340 kg in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 258 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,031 kg 4,212 kg 3,180 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 1,249 kg 6,512 kg 5,262 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 1,781 kg 4,434 kg 2,652 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 2,356 kg 4,613 kg 2,257 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 2,894 kg 4,298 kg 1,405 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 4,198 kg 3,213 kg 984.51 kg Guinea-Bissau
2020s 4,322 kg 3,772 kg 550.75 kg Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep β€” losses from manure treated, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4,598 kg against 4,340 kg in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep β€” losses from manure treated between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
258 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for sheep β€” losses from manure treated?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).