Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.3421 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.223 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Eswatini rank
95th

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.3421 kg per square kilometre against 0.223 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1191 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2178 kg per square kilometre 0.5219 kg per square kilometre 0.3041 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.2536 kg per square kilometre 0.4755 kg per square kilometre 0.2219 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.282 kg per square kilometre 0.4225 kg per square kilometre 0.1405 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.2979 kg per square kilometre 0.3338 kg per square kilometre 0.0359 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.3099 kg per square kilometre 0.3111 kg per square kilometre 0.0013 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.3282 kg per square kilometre 0.2284 kg per square kilometre 0.0998 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3397 kg per square kilometre 0.223 kg per square kilometre 0.1167 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.3421 kg per square kilometre against 0.223 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
0.1191 kg per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.