Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.3421 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.4553 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Mauritius rank
90th

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mauritius
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.4553 kg per square kilometre against 0.3421 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1132 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 90th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2178 kg per square kilometre 1.04 kg per square kilometre 0.8216 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.2536 kg per square kilometre 0.9615 kg per square kilometre 0.708 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.282 kg per square kilometre 0.8844 kg per square kilometre 0.6025 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.2979 kg per square kilometre 1.27 kg per square kilometre 0.9721 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.3099 kg per square kilometre 0.774 kg per square kilometre 0.4641 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.3282 kg per square kilometre 0.3264 kg per square kilometre 0.0018 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3397 kg per square kilometre 0.518 kg per square kilometre 0.1783 kg per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.4553 kg per square kilometre against 0.3421 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
0.1132 kg per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius rank globally for sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 90th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.