Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Libya
0.9849 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.8176 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
81st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
84th

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.9849 kg per square kilometre against 0.8176 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1673 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Libya ranks 81st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.198 kg per square kilometre 0.6522 kg per square kilometre 0.4542 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.4604 kg per square kilometre 0.3725 kg per square kilometre 0.0879 kg per square kilometre Libya
1980s 0.6527 kg per square kilometre 0.4316 kg per square kilometre 0.2211 kg per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.6829 kg per square kilometre 0.5299 kg per square kilometre 0.153 kg per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.7107 kg per square kilometre 0.6929 kg per square kilometre 0.0177 kg per square kilometre Libya
2010s 0.9422 kg per square kilometre 0.7774 kg per square kilometre 0.1648 kg per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.9715 kg per square kilometre 0.8112 kg per square kilometre 0.1603 kg per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Libya or Sao Tome and Principe?
Libya, at 0.9849 kg per square kilometre against 0.8176 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Libya and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.1673 kg per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 81st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/libya/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/libya/sao-tome-and-principe/">Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.