Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Namibia
0.6332 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.8176 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
87th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
84th

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.8176 kg per square kilometre against 0.6332 kg per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.1844 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9794 kg per square kilometre 0.6522 kg per square kilometre 0.3272 kg per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 1.11 kg per square kilometre 0.3725 kg per square kilometre 0.7345 kg per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.8409 kg per square kilometre 0.4316 kg per square kilometre 0.4093 kg per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.7285 kg per square kilometre 0.5299 kg per square kilometre 0.1986 kg per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.738 kg per square kilometre 0.6929 kg per square kilometre 0.045 kg per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.604 kg per square kilometre 0.7774 kg per square kilometre 0.1733 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.5128 kg per square kilometre 0.8112 kg per square kilometre 0.2984 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Namibia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.8176 kg per square kilometre against 0.6332 kg per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.1844 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sheep — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.