Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils

Cabo Verde
4,480 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
9,596 kg
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
122nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
119th

Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 9,596 kg against 4,480 kg in Cabo Verde, a difference of 5,116 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.1 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 122nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 119th of 192 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 551.87 kg 6,110 kg 5,558 kg Equatorial Guinea
1970s 371.3 kg 7,113 kg 6,741 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 561.02 kg 7,909 kg 7,348 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 1,825 kg 8,356 kg 6,531 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 2,107 kg 8,692 kg 6,584 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2,734 kg 9,207 kg 6,472 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 4,400 kg 9,528 kg 5,129 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep β€” manure applied to soils, Cabo Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 9,596 kg against 4,480 kg in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep β€” manure applied to soils between Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
5,116 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for sheep β€” manure applied to soils?
Cabo Verde ranks 122nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cabo-verde-2/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cabo-verde-2/equatorial-guinea/">Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).