Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils

Equatorial Guinea
9,596 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
3,836 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
114th
Eswatini rank
117th

Sheep — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 9,596 kg against 3,836 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 5,760 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 6,110 kg 8,977 kg 2,866 kg Eswatini
1970s 7,113 kg 8,179 kg 1,066 kg Eswatini
1980s 7,909 kg 7,266 kg 642.8 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 8,356 kg 5,742 kg 2,614 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 8,692 kg 5,352 kg 3,340 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 9,207 kg 3,929 kg 5,278 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 9,528 kg 3,836 kg 5,692 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure applied to soils, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Equatorial Guinea, at 9,596 kg against 3,836 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure applied to soils between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
5,760 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for sheep — manure applied to soils?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).