Central America vs New Caledonia: Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate

Central America
0.3959 % change on previous year
in 2023
New Caledonia
6.26 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central America rank
12th
New Caledonia rank
11th

Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Central America
  • New Caledonia
-40-200204060196219922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 6.26 % change on previous year against 0.3959 % change on previous year in Central America, a difference of 5.86 % change on previous year.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 15.8 times Central America's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Central America ranks 12th and New Caledonia ranks 11th of 34 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 5 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.39 % change on previous year -0.2651 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Central America
1970s -0.3032 % change on previous year 3.05 % change on previous year 3.35 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s -0.9822 % change on previous year -3.46 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year Central America
1990s 0.0482 % change on previous year -0.4575 % change on previous year 0.5058 % change on previous year Central America
2000s 3.19 % change on previous year -1.55 % change on previous year 4.75 % change on previous year Central America
2010s 0.8166 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s 0.4131 % change on previous year -4.01 % change on previous year 4.42 % change on previous year Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate, Central America or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 6.26 % change on previous year against 0.3959 % change on previous year in Central America as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate between Central America and New Caledonia?
5.86 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and New Caledonia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Central America and New Caledonia rank globally for sheep — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate?
Central America ranks 12th and New Caledonia ranks 11th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs New Caledonia: Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-annual-growth-rate/central-america/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-annual-growth-rate/central-america/new-caledonia/">Central America vs New Caledonia: Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 12,765 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sheep — Manure left on pasture (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.