Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
964.60 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
22.19 million kg
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 964.60 million kg against 22.19 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 942.40 million kg.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 43.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 33 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 361.00 million kg 6.83 million kg 354.17 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1970s 408.73 million kg 7.81 million kg 400.93 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 449.66 million kg 8.51 million kg 441.14 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 512.98 million kg 8.38 million kg 504.60 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 634.81 million kg 8.47 million kg 626.34 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 810.42 million kg 15.91 million kg 794.51 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 946.46 million kg 20.92 million kg 925.54 million kg Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 964.60 million kg against 22.19 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
942.40 million kg, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sheep — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).