Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Equatorial Guinea
0.3554 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.2317 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Eswatini rank
95th

Sheep: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.3554 kg per square kilometre against 0.2317 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1237 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2263 kg per square kilometre 0.5422 kg per square kilometre 0.3159 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.2634 kg per square kilometre 0.494 kg per square kilometre 0.2306 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.2929 kg per square kilometre 0.4389 kg per square kilometre 0.146 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.3095 kg per square kilometre 0.3468 kg per square kilometre 0.0373 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.3219 kg per square kilometre 0.3233 kg per square kilometre 0.0013 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.341 kg per square kilometre 0.2373 kg per square kilometre 0.1037 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3529 kg per square kilometre 0.2317 kg per square kilometre 0.1212 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.3554 kg per square kilometre against 0.2317 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
0.1237 kg per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.